↳ graphical scores

Instructional Art. Scores for Visual Arts

Q

Give me a few examples, where, in painting or another fine art medium, the instructions were used like score in music, thus separating the role of composer and performer. The cases where the composer and performer were the same person are also OK.

ChatGPT

In the realm of painting and fine art, there have been several notable instances where the concept of an “instruction” or “score” was used, akin to the distinction between composer and performer in music. This approach is particularly prevalent in conceptual and performance art, where the idea or concept behind the work often takes precedence over the physical execution.

Read More

The Riverscape

“The notation is more important than the sound. Not the exactitude and the success with which a notation notates a sound; but the musicalness of the notation in its notating.” (Cornelius Cardew)

Nile hr
Los Angeles Port hr
Ganges hr
Danube hr
Nile
Los Angeles Port
Ganges
Danube
 
Nile
Los Angeles Port
Ganges
Danube
previous arrow
next arrow

 

To listen to the recorded performances visit the Compositions page.

 

The Rivescape is a research project investigating and questioning the roles of composer and performer, the auditory nature of the medium of music, and the interdependency between the score and the performance.

The project originates in a series of paintings – riverscapes – sighted from above and abstracted to maps, graphically structured to serve as musical scores.

The musicians have accepted the commission to compose and perform the music based on the paintings-scores: Shira Legmann, Orr Sinay, Nitai Levi, Shaul Kohn, Tom Klein, Hovav Landoy.

Exposition

The scores created for the project, function in two media at the same time: the medium of painting and the medium of music. While serving as notations for musical compositions, the paintings don’t cease to be perceived as paintings. This creates the possibility of diffusion – the paintings take on musical intentionality, the music aspires to be a transliteration of the visuals.

The meaning shifts start with maps, dropping their purpose to describe a territory in favor of the aesthetic purpose of being pictures. In turn, the pictures, without abandoning their conventional role, take on the musical intent, serving as instructions for composing music.

The resulting score provides musicians with a form, a starting point, a key, a path, a possibility of composing the music. The paintings specify a flow of time but not limit it to any specific length. They also don’t restrict the ways of interpretation of the visual elements: shapes, sizes, colors, textures. The compositional technique is fully open, varying from improvisation, to preparing an intermediary self-score, to digital composing in post production.

The aims of the project can be reduced to three main points:

First: Attempting to construct a situation, where a performer becomes a composer by choosing to play a score. The score is indeterminate, yet it is sophisticated enough to make the transformation (player -> composer) easy by providing a formal structure, starting point and an inspiration.

Second: Trying to create a series of scores that can be perceived as self contained artifacts, possessing an aesthetic value of their own. I intentionally avoid saying “artistic” value, for the word “art” may mean different things for musicians and musical community and for the contemporary, post visual art-world community.

Third: Experimenting with reciprocal causal dependency between a self contained score and a self contained musical composition. That is, just as the painting serves a reason for a musical composition, in the same way the (future) musical composition serves a reason for creating a painting. We can call is a mutual automation.

Painting for Two Instruments

 

The Lake
In the studio
Performing instructions
 
The Lake
In the studio
Performing instructions
previous arrow
next arrow

 

This painting is intended to be used as a musical score by two performers. Its visual elements and colors are meant to be interpreted and translated into music. The performers are given the freedom to decide how they want to convert what they see in the painting into sound. This process involves both playing and composing, as the music they create will be a direct response to the artwork. Each performance will likely result in a different musical piece, reflecting the individual interpretations of the musicians. The painting acts as a starting point, with the resulting music dependent on the performers’ perceptions and expressions.

Performing instructions

Performing instructions
 

 

  • All the following instructions, without exception, should be seen as suggestions and can be altered by the performers.
  • The composition is for two players – one interpreting the background (water/sky), the other – foreground (the silhouettes of the trees).
  • The composition’s length is 7 minutes, making each plank of the board equal one minute of music, as shown on the next page.The suggested progression is from left to right, from top to bottom.
  • The properties of the painting (shapes, sizes, colors, textures) may be interpreted by the performers symbolically, metaphorically or literally at their discretion.
  • The interpretations may differ between performances.


 

Summer 2021
PlayPlay